Tags: Airplane Safety Research PaperEssay Plan For Of Mice And MenTypes Of Ing EssayNetwork Security Research Papers IeeeAnnotated Bibliography Dealing With The Civil WarCreon Tragic Hero EssayU Of T Thesis PortalGood Introductions College Application EssaysCritical Thinking In Teaching
He uses words that pop in every line and they create vivid pictures of all these different moves I’ve personally seen “Magic” perform.He talks about “magic’s” deadly no look pass, his glorious sky hook, how he glides through the air, and all of this shows just how beautiful the game of basketball is, and just how much Troupe admires it.
I remember when I stepped out onto that court my first time starting varsity in high school I felt like there was magic in the room.
All the shouts and cheers seemed to blend together but in the end all the noise was for me and my team just as he refers to it in the poem “sweating chants of your name”.
I think his reason for choosing Magic Johnson has a deeper meaning than that he really likes him as a player.
The use of the word “Magic” throughout the poem makes me feel like the actions Magic Johnson is performing in the poem are truly magic.
I could do whatever I wanted on that hoop and it made the game feel magical being able to fly above the rim just how I imagine Magic Johnson feels when he’s playing on a regular 10 foot hoop.
I can tell how much love Quincy has for the game of basketball just by how well he really describes how “Magic” played the game.
finals are underway in Los Angeles, and league executives—from P. folks to owners to the game’s top brass— must all be smiling at the marketing prospects of Lakers vs. Apologies to residents of Flagstaff or Kissimmee, but the pairing is a bit more enticing to the casual fan than Suns vs.
The Celtics and Lakers first met in the finals in 1959, and their six matchups in the sixties (6-0 Celtics, by the way) cemented the teams as foes, but the rivalry as it exists in the contemporary consciousness began in 1979, when Larry Bird and Magic Johnson entered the league. More seriously for Wallace, these books reveal how different great tennis players, runners, or basketball players are from the curious mortals who follow their careers.
Yet despite her best efforts to enliven the proceedings, the story of the two greatest basketball players of the nineteen-eighties and often heralded saviors of the N. A., fails to enthrall in just the ways Wallace has noted.
Both men worked really hard, loved to win, and now have a grudging respect for each other. Yet that’s also the revelation of the book, that the two men, for all their manifest differences, are largely, perhaps even boringly, similar. Both teams wear the same colors they did in the eighties, but everything else has changed.