How To Solve The Problem Of Global Warming

Tags: Essay On Iq TestWrite Successful Business Management EssaysAphoristic EssaysResearch Proposal Outline ExamplesElia Essays LambBusiness Plan For A Clothing StoreGrad School Essay Sample

But surely there is some other answer in the chemists toolbox.

Global warming is here, it's man-made, and it will cause serious problems in the years ahead.

All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. The argument that solving the global warming problem by reducing human greenhouse gas emissions is "too hard" generally stems from the belief that (i) our technology is not sufficiently advanced to achieve significant emissions reductions, and/or (ii) that doing so would cripple the global economy.

Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. However, studies have determined that current technology is sufficient to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the necessary amount, and that we can do so without significant impact on the economy.

This task sounds extraordinarily difficult — and it is.

Anne Fadiman Familiar Essay - How To Solve The Problem Of Global Warming

But the IPCC notes that it becomes even more difficult the longer we put off cutting emissions, because carbon-dioxide and other greenhouse gases will keep piling up in the atmosphere in the meantime, and the cuts needed to stay below the limit become more severe. First, the IPCC says that the world would have to triple or even quadruple the share of clean energy that it uses by 2050 — and keep scaling it up thereafter.

We'd then need to keep cutting and possibly be taking carbon-dioxide back out of the atmosphere by 2100.

The IPCC calculates that annual greenhouse-gas emissions would have to start dropping each year — until they were 41 percent to 72 percent below 2010 levels by mid-century.

It's too hard "The fact is that there is no one in the world who can explain how we could cut our emissions by four fifths without shutting down virtually all our existing economy.

What carries this even further into the higher realms of lunacy is that such a Quixotic gesture would do nothing to halt the world’s fast-rising CO2 emissions, already up 40 per cent since 1990.


Comments How To Solve The Problem Of Global Warming

The Latest from ©