Tags: Problem Solving Questions With AnswersLatex Thesis PicturesCritical Thinking Riddles StudentsMy Childhood Narrative EssayMentorship Essay UkRe Coursework Abortion
Foss and Griffin argue that invitational rhetoric theory is mainly derived from a feminist point of view.However, they insist that feminists are not the only ones who have developed the theory’s rules (5).I want to investigate the possible causes of why it’s so different, and what kinds of implications it has.
You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
[This article has been translated into French by @Cornwall Boar ]When I first watched Jo Jo’s Bizarre Adventure in 2012, I wasn’t out yet.
Rhetoric is mainly referred to as persuasion, “traditional rhetoric theories occur within pre-imposed or preconceived frameworks, that are reflexive and reinforce the vocabularies and tenets of those frameworks,” (Foss and Griffin 13).
In addition, these theories attempt to impose change on individuals by using persuasive means.
Invitational rhetoric refers to an invitation aimed at understanding, which fosters an equality-rooted relationship.
Invitational rhetoric involves offering the audience to enter the rhetor’s world, to witnesses his/her practices.
Another critique is the argument that invitational theory can be applicable in all situations; however, it is important to embrace different perspectives of other individuals, whereby individuals have the right to reject certain views if they are considered unacceptable.
The authors create confusion when they indicate that invitational rhetoric is optional, while at the same time, they insist that it should be used in all situations.
My specific question is: “What possible avenues have led Jo Jo’s Bizarre Adventure to arrive at a queered configuration of masculinity?
” My goal here is to to try and establish a base discourse, meaning that deeper discussions of, for example, race, ethnicity, or women can feel somewhat sparse.