To help this one miserable child would lead to the suffering of an entire city, after all. She defends the people of Omelas, who are not heartless, cruel, mindless “simple utopians,” but instead as passionate, intelligent, gentle people capable of sympathy.However, they understand that “the beauty of their city, the tenderness of their friendships, the health of their children, the wisdom of their scholars…the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.” (1552).As Jerre Collins describes in Leaving Omelas: Questions of Faith and Understanding, “The connection between the child’s suffering and the people’s happiness is stressed, yet while the narrator says that the connection can be understood, she advances no details…If the child’s suffering makes sense, that sense is not demonstrated.” (Collins 528).
To help this one miserable child would lead to the suffering of an entire city, after all. She defends the people of Omelas, who are not heartless, cruel, mindless “simple utopians,” but instead as passionate, intelligent, gentle people capable of sympathy.However, they understand that “the beauty of their city, the tenderness of their friendships, the health of their children, the wisdom of their scholars…the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.” (1552).Tags: Essay About Hotel Rwanda MovieRichard Selzer The Knife Essay Confessions Of A KnifeGoogle DissertationStay At Home Mothers EssaysHomework Help Argumentative EssayEugene Smith Photo Essay Country DoctorTyping An Essay
With all of this in mind, the question is raised of what will happen if someone, one person who dares go against the grain, frees the child.
Granted, the narrator has given all the reader’s ideas of salvation for this tortured individual a dead end. Is it not the simplest capability of all living beings, including humans, to adapt to their environment? It might be of interest to bring about the real-world case of Josef Fritzl, an Austrian man who “imprisoned [his daughter] for 24 years in a secret bunker beneath the family home, during which time she bore seven children.” (Publisher’s Weekly 49).
They serve as mechanisms of denial, a means in which the citizens use to hide themselves from humanity.
The citizens come to the consensus that nothing can be done for the child, and nothing should be done. For instance, she tells us that if the child were to be saved, “in that day and hour all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed.” (1552).
However, there exists a deeper meaning, one that is counterintuitive to everything presented in this story.
In The Child in the Broom Closet, author Elizabeth Povinelli states, “…any goods generated from the kind of misery found [in Omelas] must be seen as socially cosubstantial as well as temporally nontransferable.It can be said that the actual misery of this individual in itself is quite pointless, as there is never a concrete explanation given for how it causes Omelas to be such a successful, happy place.However, what is and what man perceives something to be are two different things.She tries to make one sympathize with and admire the resolve of the people of Omelas—“It is because of the child that they are so gentle with children.” (1552).If Le Guin’s message was that using the “greater good” model was viable to a successful society, it is very blatantly laid out in this passage.From this we can see that pleasure in Omelas, no matter how over-the-top, should be celebrated.In our society, producing a child from fornication is frowned upon and discouraged, but in Omelas it is embraced fully.Analysis of “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. It is a fantastical place so transcendental that the author herself struggles to properly detail its majesty.Omelas has everything— it is beautiful, technologically advanced, and bears no need for organized religion.However, they were still able to adapt to normal life.Fritzl’s daughter, Elisabeth who was nearly driven insane by her imprisonment, is alive and healthy, and the children born out of her imprisonment do bear genetic defects and signs of intense psychological trauma, but they regularly receive therapy and are living in a loving, secure, safe environment.