If you have a sense of how the topic cleaves into sub-topics, you can identify a few possible chapters.If you will be doing interviews, describe your interview methodology in the light of the Evaluation Guidelines by the Oral History Association.
Reorganize the annotations into a narrative that guides your reader through your understandings of the field.
If you have an unfamiliar or complicated narrative, you may wish to begin the intellectual context section with a section on “Historical Background.” Or, you can fold background information in the “Intellectual Context” section.
Tell how you can contribute to the ongoing conversation between other historians by conducting an analysis of your chosen primary source.
The more you know about your primary source, the easier it will be to describe your source in detail.
All Brown History Department Thesis must conform to the university’s IRB regulations. 7.) Return to your research problem and assure us that your research plan will add value to others’ understanding of it.
If you believe that your research has a potential practical application as in Booth, Colomb, and Williams, Bibliography – Divide your bibliography into two sections under the headings: “Primary Sources” and “Secondary Sources.” Check with your advisor, but if you’ve written your intellectual context well, it should not be necessary to annotate your bibliography in the prospectus. Don’t pad the bibliography with sources you haven’t discussed in the prospectus.When you survey the field, what common tendencies and unanswered questions stand out? For each work or author cited, identify productive insights and remaining questions that will inform your research.Restate your research topic in the conclusion to this section.3-6.) In essence, this section constitutes a literature review.Use the annotated bibliography (step #4 above) as the basis for this section. The History honors program traditionally allows the student and primary advisor a lot of freedom to define a topic and frame it appropriately, but the following steps summarize a process that has been helpful to students in HIST 1992.TOPIC: “I will study...” CONCEPTUAL QUESTION: “Because I want to find out how ...” CONCEPTUAL SIGNIFICANCE: “In order to help readers understand whether...” While it may seem premature to answer these questions so early in the process, the steps outlined in are useful because they will help you write a prospectus that is focused and analytical.We require a full bibliography in addition to the footnotes. Prospectuses are graded according to the following rubric: A No concerns about the viability of the project A- No concerns about the viability of the project, but minor weaknesses in execution B Concerns about the viability of the project, but a willingness to reevaluate before the beginning of the 7th semester.A dissertation prospectus is a paradoxical piece of writing.” and thus make a stronger case for your research topic.A good grounding in the secondary literature is the best way to establish conceptual significance.